So What do I Mean by ‘Banning’ Smartphones?

Should Cellphones Be Allowed in Class? More specifically, we are referring here to smartphones, phones that connect to the internet, and social media apps, because those are the real danger to development and learning.

Given the amount of data that points to the use of smartphones and social media having a negative impact on youth1, it’s clear that schools should be smartphone-free during the school day if we want our kids to learn.2

Psychologist Jonathan Haidt, author of The Anxious Generation, argues that kids between the ages of 9 and 15 are particularly susceptible to the harmful effects of social media.3

And most kids access social media from their phones. We know this age is in a more sensitive brain development phase and therefore more susceptible to what they are exposed to in a digital world with few guardrails and a lot of bad actors wanting to bend young minds for profit. As a former digital marketing business owner and expert, I know the lengths social platforms go to to keep kids on their apps. And they spend hundreds of millions to do it.

I don’t mean kids should put their smartphones in their pockets on silent while they buzz incessantly, or even turned off.

They are still too accessible and students will work around those rules because nothing is stronger than the pull of a peer wanting their attention or the number of likes they might have on their social media post.

We need to adopt the option they use at concerts–putting them in a locked bag at the beginning of the school day which yes, takes effort. Once they are disallowed, you’d have the time and resources to engage the SROs (school resource officers) to help with this task. And I’m going to bet they’d be willing since so many of the school problems they deal with involve a smartphone.

image playbook for mentally healthy students and a mentally healthy school culture

First, Let’s Drop the Word “Ban”

Maybe for our purposes, we don’t call it a ban because that sounds punitive. Maybe it’s “Unplugged for Mental Health & Learning” or “Smartphone-Free School.” Those are just thoughts because it should not be the adults coming up with the name of the experiment but the students.

I expect pushback on this.

Some argue that mobile phone limitations will make the phones more desirable like alcohol was during prohibition.

However, this is not complete abstinence– just a break. We get a student advisory board to be invested in the experiment so they don’t feel the rule is being forced upon them.

We could get their input on the potential negative and positive outcomes of having time away from the devices. You’d be surprised to know that some kids are relieved although they might not readily admit this in front of peers.

Then we have to create a survey after a month or so and get feedback.

  • How did it feel?
  • What were the negatives?
  • What were the positives?

There could even be a panel or debate on the issue, with both sides presenting their argument. And then go from there.

Another argument against limiting smartphones is that they should be used to advance educational goals

These are personal devices and our curriculums have not yet caught up to a point where this makes sense. Right now they serve as a distraction and don’t support a learning environment.

See the free eBook Library here

Why Do Parents Object to No Cell Phones in Schools?

Despite a great deal of evidence that mobile phones cause a lot of issues with youth mental health, some parents have been opposed to limiting access to phones in school.

The reason I hear most often from parents is the fear of school shootings or some other tragedy or violence.

Parents want that immediate message their kid is OK. And I get that. I’m a mom, too, and we are a nation that lives in terror of school shootings and violence.

First, consider that while the media publicizes school shootings and they capture the national attention, and for good reason, they are still rare.

A child has a greater chance of being injured or killed by falling debris than of being killed in a school shooting. That’s not to say we shouldn’t be prepared but how does a child having one at school prevent them from getting hurt?

From Deputy David Gomez:

“Cellphones are a drug, and kids are wired to get addicted,” Idaho’s Boise County Sheriff Deputy Dave Gomez says. I now strongly advise against children under the age of 13 having smartphones. I’ve seen too many 9 to 11-year-olds making life-altering decisions on social media platforms they shouldn’t be using. Additionally, numerous parents have expressed to me their surprise at the extent of trouble their young children can encounter online. If we want our kids to learn, we have to take away those cell phones.”

Wanting our Children to Have Phones in School Placates Parents’ Fears

But what is the cost?

Are we so afraid of a potential school shooting that we trade our children’s mental, psychosocial, and academic well-being for the convenience of being able to reach them when we want them for a dentist appointment pick-up or after a disaster that has not occurred? Think about it. This serves no purpose other than to soften parents’ anxiety.

In addition, cell phones (smartphones), add to the loneliness epidemic4 and reduce opportunities for kids to build coping skills. How? The mobile phone is a crutch for avoiding that awkward face-to-face interaction which translates to fewer opportunities to build resilience skills. Today’s kids are not learning the coping skills that the bungled and awkward interactions teach them.

If you cut open a cocoon to help a caterpillar-turning-butterfly avoid the struggle of emerging, you rob it of the ability to fly. It’s the struggle to escape the cocoon that forces fluid from the wings, strengthening them, and enabling flight.5

hand holding smartphone no cell phone

Here are the Key Reasons for Banning Cell Phones (Smartphones) in K-12 Schools:

If we want kids to learn, we must ban smartphones in schools.

  • Classroom disruptions: Cell phones interrupt instruction as students receive notifications, texts, and calls during lessons. Even if they aren’t actively using the phone, the vibration feeds the temptation to check it which diverts attention away from learning.
  • Multitasking issues: Students might try to multitask by texting, playing games, or browsing social media during class, which hinders their ability to focus on what’s being taught, absorb information, and participate in classroom discussions.

“I have been working in a high school for the past year, and I can tell you, as boots on the ground, in the middle of this debate, that there is a marked improvement in everything from learning to mental health. Last school year, we did not have any real policy around mobile technology. Fast forward to this fall, where we implemented a no cell phone during instruction policy. This has been a game-changer.” 

Kristen, On Staff at a High School in the USA
  • Screen Addiction6: Try taking away that phone and some kids will have an all-out tantrum. Giving your kids a break from the phone and saying “Hey it’s out of my hands, that is the rule,” takes the pressure off of you. Less screen time forces them to use their head and also reduces the time and therefore the mental health risks associated with everything that can be accessed through a phone.
  • Other Addictions: Screen addiction can lead to other addictions like drug addiction and gambling. One of the fastest-growing addictions is sports betting by university students. My son Charles used his cell phone at school to set up buying drugs and to supply kids with illegal alcohol at parties for cash to feed his growing substance misuse problem that became a heroin addiction. More time with phones increases the risk of getting into trouble.
  • Phones lower academic achievement: Studies suggest that students who use phones during class tend to perform worse academically. Students who used their phones in class took fewer notes [7] and had poorer overall academic performance, compared to those who did not.7” Phones can interfere with both short-term understanding and long-term retention of information.
  • Reduces problem-solving skills: Constant access to information via cell phones may prevent students from engaging in deeper thinking and problem-solving. In short, these devices hinder the development of critical thinking in adolescents which is a key skill in building resilience and coping strategies they need for their lives.

It’s unlikely parents have been able to prevent cyberbullying at home any more than the school has, yet parents often accuse the school of not doing more. This is true in some cases. But a lot is happening on those mobile phones parents give the kids and they need a break from the 24/7 harassment. They also need boundaries. No school can police what kids visit on those phones.

  • Increased risk of bullying: Cell phones make it easier for students to engage in or become victims of cyberbullying. They can receive or send hurtful messages, spread rumors, or share inappropriate photos.
  • Social exclusion: Social media and texting can lead to cliques and exclusionary behavior, where students may feel pressured to maintain a certain online persona, exacerbating anxiety and peer pressure. There is also sextortion, a form of child sexual exploitation where a young person is blackmailed, most often with the threat of sharing sexual images of them in public, by a person who demands additional sexual content, sexual activity, or money from the child.
  • Anxiety and depression: Excessive cell phone use, especially social media, is linked to higher levels of anxiety, depression, and loneliness in students 1, 4. The constant comparison, the conformity effect to which youth are susceptible, fear of missing out (FOMO), and online criticism can negatively affect mental well-being.
  • Sleep disruption: Students who bring phones to school may stay up late using them, which can impact their sleep patterns, leading to fatigue, reduced attention, and poor academic performance. They need a break.
  • Facilitates cheating: Cell phones allow easy access to information during tests and quizzes, enabling students to look up answers or share them with peers. This undermines academic integrity and the fairness of assessments.
  • Plagiarism: Students may use phones to copy text or ideas from the internet without proper citation, further contributing to academic dishonesty.
  • Lack of Focus during emergencies: In case of emergency, students might panic and attempt to contact parents via their phones instead of following the school’s emergency protocols. This could create confusion, hinder evacuation efforts, or worsen the situation.
  • Theft and damage: Cell phones in school can increase the likelihood of theft, damage, or loss of personal property, which could lead to conflicts among students, parents and the school.
  • Online Danger: Approximately 40 percent of sex trafficking victims are recruited online, which makes the internet the most common recruiting ground
  • Reduced social interaction: When students are glued to their phones during breaks and free periods, it limits face-to-face interactions and opportunities to develop essential social skills. This can harm their ability to communicate effectively and build meaningful relationships. How many kids do you know who can make eye contact with an adult?
  • Dependence on technology: Allowing constant access to phones may reinforce dependence on technology as a primary form of communication and entertainment, which can stifle creativity and independent thinking.
  • Disparity in access: Not all students have access to the latest or most advanced smartphones. Those who don’t may feel left out or less connected, leading to a sense of inequity among peers. And connection and belonging are crucial to good mental health and well-being.
  • Economic strain: For families, the expectation that students should have a phone to stay connected or access school materials can impose financial pressure, particularly on low-income households. (These phones cost far more than cool shoes or jeans do.)
  • Disruption to school policies: Schools often have strict policies regarding appropriate behavior and technology use, and cell phones can challenge these policies, leading to conflicts between students and teachers or administrators.
  • Undermining school culture: Over-reliance on phones may erode the school’s culture of engagement, respect, and attentiveness, as students become more isolated and less inclined to participate in school activities.

Creating smartphone-free schools in K-12 has been shown to mitigate these issues, fostering a more focused, equitable, and socially engaging learning environment.

symptoms of depression

How to Recognize Symptoms of Depression

  • For those who are curious about their own symptoms 
  • For those who love someone they suspect may be living with depression
  • Signs you’ve read about and signs that are less talked about w/ examples
  • What loved ones can say/do to be supportive plus resources

Sources

1Media Use Is Linked to Lower Psychological Well-Being: Evidence from Three Datasets
Twenge JM, Campbell WK. Media Use Is Linked to Lower Psychological Well-Being: Evidence from Three Datasets. Psychiatr Q. 2019 Jun;90(2):311-331. doi: 10.1007/s11126-019-09630-7. PMID: 30859387.

2 Dividing attention in the classroom reduces exam performance
Glass, A. L., & Kang, M. (2018). Dividing attention in the classroom reduces exam performance. Educational Psychology, 39(3), 395–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2018.1489046

3 Public Enemy #1?: Smartphones and a Generation at Risk

4 Loneliness unlocked: Associations with smartphone use and personality
Kristi Baerg MacDonald, Julie Aitken Schermer, Loneliness unlocked: Associations with smartphone use and personality,
Acta Psychologica, Volume 221, 2021, 103454, ISSN 0001-6918,

5 Unforgettable Story of The Butterfly and The Cocoon – Struggles Give Us Strength

6 Screen addicts: A meta-analysis of internet addiction in adolescence

7 Mobile phones: The effect of its presence on learning and memory
Tanil CT, Yong MH. Mobile phones: The effect of its presence on learning and memory. PLoS One. 2020 Aug 13;15(8):e0219233. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0219233. PMID: 32790667; PMCID: PMC7425970.

8 The Mobile Phone Addiction and Depression Among High School Students: The Roles of Cyberbullying Victimization, Perpetration, and Gender
Wu W, Chen Y, Shi X, Lv H, Bai R, Guo Z, Yu L, Liu Y, Liu J, Chen Y, Zeng Y. The Mobile Phone Addiction and Depression Among High School Students: The Roles of Cyberbullying Victimization, Perpetration, and Gender. Front Psychol. 2022 Apr 27;13:845355. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.845355. PMID: 35572285; PMCID: PMC9095501.

Support from other sources: